What art have I seen?
Ettie Spencer at the Dick Institute, Kilmarnock
Oh! Mother…. what the hell are we going to do about this? The birds are shitting on the floor and the Japanese knotweed is taking over. Even the hoovers can’t cope with the mess and are floating out to sea.
Ettie Spencer’s show at the Dick Institute Kilmarnock makes a pretty clear point. To what extent can man control nature? Has the enlightenment project of imposing rational order finally run its course?
Each of the works juxtaposes a made structure with an element of nature. The cage for the birds is a huge arrow, constructed from angle iron and mesh, pointing out of the gallery towards the open air, but tethered by concrete blocks. It mixes the aesthetic of the delicate birdcage with the scale and material of industrial fabrication. The birds are content enough to inhabit this sign, and yet the irony is that the very symbol of escape is their cage.
Equally the Knotweed racked up in hospital laundry trolleys forms a wall of green in the gallery, also inhabiting the industrial scale of human management systems. Knotweed is described by conservationists as an alien and threatening species. Any fragment of root will generate another plant. Thus it is described as the largest female in the world.
Spencer’s video work, upright hoovers, shaped out of polystyrene, are floating out to sea. They might land on distant shores – a sort of desperate housewife’s message in a bottle.
Going back to see the exhibition again, I was strangely disappointed that the knotweed had not completely filled the gallery. I don’t know why, but I had hoped that instead of the same gallery installation, the living elements would have broken free from the made constraints and that coming back to the gallery would have been like entering a new and natural world.
What art have I seen?
Manchester Piccadilly – This City Wall
Len Grant and Phil Griffin
I found the text below in a folder on my laptop – according to the properties it was modified 23 June 2006 so it must have been written right about then. I had been freelance since February of that year. I had been helping Helix Arts with an evaluation of the Climate Change: Culture Change project and must have just been in the development phase of Greenhouse Britain, probably having been to Shrewsbury and met the Harrisons. It’s a curious piece of history and I’m posting it pretty much as a curiousity.
It’s a very good question – why am I interested in Climate Change?
There are a number of answers – firstly I acknowledge that it will have a significant impact on my life, and the life of my family and friends, and it is having an effect on the lives of other people who I don’t know, and other living things on the planet. But that requires me to reduce my ‘carbon footprint’ (in the jargon) – to travel less by plane and car, to reduce energy consumption in my house, etc. It does not require me to make it part of my work as a cultural historian/curator/person involved with contemporary art.
I became interested in issues of art and the environment through a number of experiences and observations – I used to be Director of the Scottish Sculpture Workshop, and this is located in rural Aberdeenshire – it was a ‘modernist sculpture factory’ dislocated from its natural urban habitat to a rural one, by virtue of the inclinations of the founder director. I heard Declan McGonagle, then Director of the Irish Museum of Modern Art (IMMA), speak in Dundee about the challenges of transforming a building which was part of the British colonial history in Ireland into a space for modern art. He highlighted and emphasised the importance of engaging with the cultural history and the surrounding communities. IMMA places its relationship with its locality as a key thread of work.
I also began to look at the work of artists who worked within the environment across a range of strategies and tactics – I invited John Maine to work with us and a quarry company – this resulted in an 8 year project constructing a new landscape on the rim of an historical quarry in Aberdeenshire, and in passing involved 8 years of research and exploration of the prehistory and history of stone in the landscape of Aberdeenshire.
I commissioned Nina Pope to explore the interface between the rural and the digital with a group of young artists.
I commissioned Gavin Renwick to explore buildings in the rural environment of Aberdeenshire again with a small group of artists and architects. This opened up a political dimension and resulted in a series of events looking at Devolution in Scotland from a (rural) cultural perspective. The work with Renwick developed into another project looking at cultural continuity and human settlement in the context of the village and Aberdeenshire.
Another tack over this territory was the Making Places residency with Wendy Gunn – she brought in Craig Dykers of Snohetta and Tim Ingold, Chair of Anthropology at the University of Aberdeen. Tim in particular spoke about movement in the landscape – knowing places and finding them. We explored Aberdeenshire through a multi-disciplinary team including artists, architects, archaeologists, anthropologists, land-use researchers, and inhabitants.
I ran a programme of visiting speakers on public art – Penny Balkin Bach from Fairmount Park Art Association in Philadephia, Anna Pepperall from Gateshead in the North East of England, and Stefanie Bourne from the Sustrans organisation. I commissioned or acted as the commissioning agent for quite a lot of public art – this did not take thinking forward, but it is always interesting to work with artists. Where it was interesting was when there was an opportunity to for an artist to develop work of their own, or where a commissioner was willing to take risks and be very open.
Helen Denerley’s Craws at the Safeway in Inverurie simply addressed one of the characteristic aspects of the area, and David Annand’s Aberdeenshire Angus was the best possible thing that could be done on the basis of the ambition of the village of Alford.
But more interestingly, George Beasley and Helen Denerley’s collaboration over the Boundaries project brought the whole population of Glen Deskry into making a work of art, and the CairnGorm Mountain landscape initiative has resulted in a truly significant work by Arthur Watson in collaboration with many of his colleagues. In this work he is addressing hte multiple cultural histories of the Cairngorms. The first phase of work involves dangerous drawing – exploring the naming of rock climbs – the dotted lines that overlay the cliffs and crags of the mountain.
But as to climate change – all of the above is characterised by
1. rural and inhabited
2. artists with other disciplines
3. reflection and action
Now I have been involved in Practice led research for 6 or 7 years, initially as a partner and collaborator, now probably as a researcher, and in the future as a PhD candidate. This has only been possible because of my colleague Anne Douglas and On The Edge, her research project into a new articulation of the value of the visual arts in marginal contexts. Whilst On The Edge does not speak to climate change directly, it addresses the idea of ‘life as art’ and the reposition of art within the everyday. It also is a hugely important space for thinking rigorously and creatively across such a wide range of issues in partnership, not just within the core team, but much more widely.
I’m not interested in climate change because its a new theme in the endless cycle of issue based work eddying through contemporary art. I’m not interested because there might be funding. I am interested because it is an evolution of the work – it asks not just how do we live here? How do artists respond to this place? How can we look again at where we are?
It goes beyond that to ‘we have to live differently. How can we do that creatively?’ Climate change is therefore not the only driver. There are also social drivers and ethical drivers and aesthetic drivers.
My dissertation for my MLitt in Cultural History was all about Utopia, its underpinning of the Humanist project and the embedded structures of power and social organisation – it was a critique. I think perhaps I am still involved in the critique of the humanist project and the idea of utopia.
What art have I seen?
Launch of Phase I of Arthur Watson’s work at CairnGorm Mountain. Great to see this project coming to fruition. I still think it is a shame that Winifred isn’t part of it: pacem.
I think I first went to meet Bob Kinnaird in March 2001.
It all started with a phone call from Judi Menabeny, then the visual arts officer for Badenoch and Strathspey (?). Bob had contacted her looking for help to develop the arts as part of the development of the funicular. At that time the Funicular was a big story attracting a lot of negative press. Anyway, Judi called me and I went over to see Bob. I was immediately struck by the landscape – who wouldn’t be? But to me it was the bulldozed airstrip that you can see from 10 miles away. That is the first visitor experience.
Quickly we set aside the idea of the sculpture park on the mountain, and looked to do something that addressed the relationship between the organisation and its context. Clearly Bob’s thinking about the living mountain has developed in the process as well.
What art have I seen?
Climate Change: Cultural Change at the Globe Gallery:
Michael Pinsky, Peter Rogers and Helen Mayer and Newton Harrison.
I’m evaluating this project.
leave a comment