Are dialogic and relational aesthetics relevant to all participatory and co-creative practitioners?
Artists understand the potential of an aesthetics of process and the social. But does this mean anything to the designers, architects, programmers and others who work with participation and co-creativity? Further thoughts on the Practising Equality paper published in the Participations Journal.
One of the questions we asked in the conclusions of the Practising Equality paper (2013), looking across art, design, architecture and new media at practices of co-creativity and participation, is whether the development of thinking about the aesthetics of participation in art has relevance to design, architecture and new media?
The emergence of a debate around the aesthetics of process and the social in art is one of the important developments of the past 25 years. Whether we are talking about Bourriaud’s ‘relational aesthetics’ discussing participatory work in galleries, or Kester’s attention to ‘dialogic aesthetics’ in situated practices, or Bishop’s interest in the perversity of participation, all are concerned with an aesthetics of process and social relations.
Suzanne Lacy, who is both the subject of one of Kester’s case studies and also a contributor to the discourse herself, draws attention to Allan Kaprow’s concerns. Kaprow’s practice is fundamentally participatory and…
View original post 1,179 more words
CHRIS FREMANTLE 
leave a comment