Two views of participatory art
Eleanor Heartney’ review in Art in America provides a useful comparison of Kester and Bishop’s new books which continue the argument between these key theorists of socially engaged and participatory arts practices.
CHRIS FREMANTLE
About
Join 2,938 other subscribers
Search stuff
Stuff is categorised
Pages
- About
- Blog
- Initiatives
- Producing, Project Managing, Researching
- Writing
- A Call to Farms: SW Scotland
- A co-operative future
- Bob Dylan acknowledges a debt
- Habitat for…
- Half-Life
- Interview: Wilhelm Scherubl (2000)
- Sweeping
- Iron Conference: the art of recidivism?
- Place of Origin
- John Latham
- Soil: A Virtue
- Not place but context
- Soil
- Earthworks, Brian Aldiss
- On The Edge (Phase 1) Papers
- Exploring Places
from ecoartscotland.net
- The Right Tree in the Right Place?
- Ecoart in Action: Activities, Case Studies, and Provocations for Classrooms and Communities
- Art and Activism towards COP – Guest Review by Marc Herbst
- Shelby Bennett reviews Robyn Woolston’s ‘Yours, in Extraction’
- Erika Cann and Siân Goldby: Towards a geological-artistic practice
- ecoartscotland library as bing
- Beverly Naidus reviews ‘We are nature defending itself’
- Inge Panneels on ‘Ocean ARTic’, ecoart, and big data
- BD Owens reviews ‘Assuming the Ecosexual Position’ by Beth Stephens and Annie Sprinkle
- Becoming Earthly 2022
My Networks
- Ayr Converses
- Ayrshire Arts Network
- CORE
- Curatorial Network
- EcoArt Network
- Greenmuseum.org
- Greenspace Scotland
- On The Edge Research
- PAR+RS
- Public Art Online
- Scottish Artists Union
- VAGA
- Visiting Arts
- Voluntary Arts Scotland
- Yasmin
CHRIS FREMANTLE 
leave a comment